Sunday, March 6, 2011

Movie Review: The Adjustment Bureau


“The Adjustment Bureau” a wonderful tangle of fate and love

***½ /**** (3.5 stars out of 4)



“So now I'm goin' back again,

I got to get to her somehow […]

We always did feel the same,

We just saw it from a different point of view,

Tangled up in blue.”

- Bob Dylan, “Tangled Up in Blue”


“The Adjustment Bureau” is like one giant visual representation of Dylan’s song; that is, it is art done right.

We are treated with a wholly poignant film with just enough intellectual teasings. Instead of bogging us down with the details of just how the Bureau works, its members never take themselves too seriously for the most part.

Many have criticized this, insisting that given the film’s short running time, writer/director George Nolfi should have provided more explanation of the story’s sci-fi threads.

I think this is the beauty of the film, though.

We are treated to an easily digestible story dealing with the various implications of both sides of the free will issue. However, we are spared the pseudo-philosophy that bogs down films like “Dark City.”

It’s not that these issues aren’t interesting. But they can get in the way of our characters, which ultimately move the story along. “The Adjustment Bureau” thankfully does not fall victim to this.

Matt Damon stars as David Norris, a rising politician running for the United State Senate. When he loses an early lead, he meets a mysterious woman (Emily Blunt) while rehearsing his concession speech in the hotel bathroom. Their chemistry is immediate, and after sharing a kiss, David is inspired and delivers a very honest speech that is well-received.

One morning, an agent of the Bureau fails to make an “adjustment” on David. Rather than David spilling his coffee and being late for work, David gets a glimpse of the future the Bureau does not want him to have. He meets the mysterious woman again by chance. She introduces herself as Elise and gives David her phone number.

Thus begins the scramble of the Bureau to get things back on track. They tell David he must never see Elise again. When he ignores their requests, they start taking drastic measures to ensure that David and Elise remain apart.

Of course, as David struggles to be with her, Elise feels betrayed by David’s lack of stability in their relationship. One of the Bureau’s agents finally convinces David to move on from Elise, and eleven months later David is running for Senate and Elise is engaged to another.

David finally decides he cannot have a life without her. In the face of overwhelming odds, he decides to forsake the predetermined path and risk everything to be with her.

This sounds like the kind of high-stakes storytelling that produces very moving results but only if the leads are believable. Damon and Blunt hit a homerun with their performances. Nothing ever feels forced, which is important for whatever payoff we get in the end.

I applaud the film’s commitment to telling its story with the tone it does. Some may view it as over-the-top, but the film grounds itself in its emotional core. This is vital.

Even if the film avoided the criticisms of its sci-fi scenario, we would be faced with another serious charge: so what? Because the film places its characters and their story first, we know why it all matters.

“The Adjustment Bureau” is based on a short story by Philip K. Dick ("Total Recall," "Minority Report" and "Blade Runner"), yet it is a film that remains more hopeful than these others. Instead of getting caught up in the trappings of various philosophical conundrums, the film gets tangled in the most human aspect of the film: love. We can’t help but get ourselves tangled up as well.





Running Time: 99 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13

Critic’s Rating: 3.5 stars (***½)

Bottom Line: Despite grumblings over an underexplained plot, “The Adjustment Bureau” is a well-crafted and an extremely moving piece of art.


Monday, February 28, 2011

Let's Party Like It's 1988

By now, the damage from the 83rd Academy Awards is too much to overcome. I can't even brag about calling Tom Hooper's upset of David Fincher for Best Director because of how poorly the rest of my predictions played out. Granted, I got tripped up by the 3 Horsemen of the Oscar Pool Apocalypse, the short film categories. I went 0-3 this year.

But in my post-show gloom, I decided to ramp up my usual comparative analysis of the present year's ceremony to a past year's ceremony. And boy do I have quite the comparison for this year...

Oddly enough, it's the year I was born: 1988.

(Side note: The 61st Academy Awards saw the introduction of the classic phrase "And the Oscar goes to...")

The King's Speech and Inception both tallied 4 wins this year. In 1988, Rain Man and Who Framed Roger Rabbit both garnered 4 wins.

The King's Speech and Rain Man won the same 4 categories! Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, and Best Original Screenplay.

Inception and Who Framed Roger Rabbit triumphed in the technical awards (both won awards for sound and visual effects).

Inception and Who Framed Roger Rabbit were the commercial favorites, capturing the adoration of national audiences. (Of course, Rain Man and The King's Speech also eclipsed the $100 million mark at the domestic box office.) Both films are gamechangers in story-telling. The King's Speech and Rain Man were fairly straightforward movies.

Hoffman's character in Rain Man suffers from a restrictive/repetitive behavioral impediment. Colin Firth's character in The King's Speech is no different.

The Social Network and Dangerous Liaisons both won 3 Oscars. Both were nominated for Best Picture, and both won the Best Adapted Screenplay award. Both are tales of sexual seduction; one is set in Pre-Revolution France and the other set around Facebook. Click this now.

Natalie Portman just won her first Best Actress Oscar at the age of 29. Her breakthrough role was at the age of 13, playing a 12 year-old girl with an uncomfortably awkward relationship with a much older man. (Roger Ebert questioned the film's "would-be sexy portrayal of a pre-teenage girl.")

Jodie Foster won her first Best Actress Oscar at the age of 26. Her breakthrough role was at the age of 13, playing a 12 year-old girl with an uncomfortably awkward relationship with much older men. (She played a child prostitute.)

Their Oscar-winning roles involved controversial sexual topics.

Christian Bale and Kevin Kline won Best Supporting Actor Oscars. Both were both middle-aged (36 for Bale and 41 for Kline) and in the middle of very successful acting careers at the time of their wins. Unlike Bale's triumph, Kline's victory was considered an upset.

Hans Zimmer was nominated in both years, for Rain Man and Inception. He lost both times.

A Tim Burton film won the Academy Award for Best Makeup: Beetlejuice (1988) and Alice in Wonderland (2010).

Finally, the 1988 and 2010 winners of Best Foreign Language Film came from Denmark (Pelle the Conqueror and In a Better World).

And you probably thought I was reading too much into all of this...